Posts Tagged ‘Occupy’

One of my favourite international holidays, Martin Luther King (Jr.) left an amazing legacy to the civil rights community, and activists worldwide who practice non-violent protest. Arguably, #OccupyWallStreet is the first major heir to this style of protest, as the civil rights movement became the heir to it after the Indian independance movement.

I wonder a lot, when I listen or read about current events, what Dr. King would think about the Occupy movement. He would certainly be appalled by the continuing ghetto-isation of America, and would find no comfort in the fact that the ghettos have been integrated, with occasional poor white people suffering nearby.

I know he would certainly be right with the Occupation movement in their stance against poverty, and the excesses of capitalism- you don’t have to read very much of Dr. King’s work, or listen to many of his speeches, to know that he considered corporate oppression against the poor almost as large a problem in the America of his time as racism and segregation were, and corporate greed has become much, much worse since then. Would he commend their commitment to non-violence? Have Occupy done well enough in their protests for that? I like to hope they have. I won’t speculate too much more on this subject, before I start putting words in his mouth that we can’t easily hear from the tenor of his speeches.

He would certainly condemn the use of pepper spray and other police brutality, having seen similar brutality used against his own brothers and sisters fighting for civil rights. He would certainly commend the inspiration taken from the people of what is being labelled the Arab Spring, having learned his own lessons of solidarity in his visit to post-colonial India.

Would Dr. King have supported queer rights? It’s hard to say. He may have been more open to it than many Christians were, but it’s impossible in discussing Dr. King to forget that he was a minister, and even the most liberal of Christian ministers sometimes cannot extend their support for civil rights into the religious realm, supporting the rights of women or queers to be members in full of their religion. It is possibly a good sign that his wife, Coretta Scott King, thought that arguments against gay marriage were equivalent to the arguments used against interracial relationships and marriage, so if he had avoided his untimely death, maybe Dr. King would have been convinced by the same factors that led his wife to believe in queer rights.

I always find this day inspiring and heartening. While we still have to fight hard to maintain and expand our civil rights, there is an incredible legacy behind us, with people from all around the world, from all sorts of communities, involved in it, and engaging in extreme feats of solidarity with each other. There is so much that we, around the world, can learn from the legacy of Dr. King, that I think this day will still resonate around the world in a hundred years time.


Until we have learned those lessons, I’d like to extend my words in solidarity with anyone in the USA who is in need of their civil rights still. This day isn’t just for the legacy of Dr. King, it should be about you.

The other day, I had the distinct displeasure of tripping over, hitting my mouse, and accidentally clicking over to one of Chris Trotter’s articles, which as always, was large on opinion and short on research. In an earlier life, I have joined the chorus of voices on the populist left that point out that the old guard like Chris Trotter (and now I guess also Pagani) are vastly unrepresentative of the left, even among Labour supporters, and once again he proves our point for us.

I’m not going to wade into whether Occupy encampments in New Zealand have lived up to their American counterparts, or the legacy of other non-violent movements, such as the independence movement in India or the civil rights movement in the USA. Those sorts of questions are, I think, best answered by people who actually participated in those movements.

The truth is absolutely that they have not had as clear an impact or as easy a job as foreign occupations have. There are probably good reasons to this that are not the fault nor under the control of New Zealand occupiers. In that sense, there is some truth to the general thrust of his piece. That’s not what I want to object to.

I didn’t even write this post to address the spurious claim that the movement should go away, as if we don’t have freedom of political assembly in New Zealand. (constitutionally, there’s no question that we do. In practice, the ability of councils to evict Occupations has now relegated freedom of assembly in New Zealand to theory at best. A council should not be allowed to evict a protest)

No, what I want to object to is his stupid throwaway line near the end of his piece:

New Zealand’s Occupy Movement has fizzled for all of the above reasons, and more, but its single greatest failure has been its refusal to transform its manifestly untrue claim to represent 99 per cent of the New Zealand public into anything resembling reality.

Chris Trotter fails to understand the refrain of the Occupy movement. Occupiers haven’t claimed to represent the whole 99%. Their refrain, “We are the 99%!” is one of solidarity, something you would expect the old guard to understand- protestors pointing out that they are like you, regular people, and that you are welcome to join, that they are part of the majority and ignoring their opinions is undemocratic. They are pointing out that their opponents take positions which hurt the vast majority of society, and that what they want is populist reform that puts large corporations and the wealthy elite back in their place. Occupations don’t believe in representative politics, they are as horizontal a heirarchy as can be practically managed, and practice participatory democracy.

If you don’t understand that, Chris Trotter, you’re not qualified to comment on Occupy encampments.