Shorter NYT: Should Journalists do their jobs?

Posted: January 13, 2012 in media
Tags: , ,

Public editor of the New York Times, Arthur Brisbane, asks their readership if:

…New York Times news reporters should challenge “facts” that are asserted by newsmakers they write about.

and is then surprised and claims he was misunderstood when its readers essentially answer with a chorus of “yes, you moron” replies, and comments hopeful that this would result in a paper that actually reported the facts as facts and opinion as opinion. He went as far as to call this process being a “truth vigilante”.

Journalists must aggressively seek to ascertain and report the truth. It needs to be not just a profession, but more than that, a calling, to tell the truth about the powerful and what they’re saying. When someone makes a claim, it’s okay to fact-check it, and okay to tell us whether you found anything, or even if you couldn’t find anything. We like to know these things. You don’t need to hand us your conclusions, (that’s for the editorial pages) but please, for the sake of journalism, hand us all your evidence, and put your fact-checking next to the statements that are being fact-checked, so casual readers don’t miss them.

A “truth vigilante” would be someone who runs around punching anyone who lies to them. A person who aggressively challenges the claims of the rich and powerful is a “journalist”, especially if they admit it when they are corrected after going either too far, or not far enough. Here’s hoping the New York Times will listen to the thousands of people around the world that are speaking truth to power, and start catering to the vast market for actual journalism that we’re all so thirsty for, because they really did understand what they read the first time, and they know what they want.

Advertisements
Comments
  1. puffdaddy1991 says:

    I was actually shocked when I read this question. I guess that a reporter/journalist considered this a part of their job description. Hopefully, all journalists will read the response of the “yes, you moron”, not just the ones at the NYT.

  2. If you’ll excuse my cynicism, it’s not shocking – at least to me – in terms of what this question tells you about the media in general. Mainstraim news publications have essentially been stenographers (that’s verbose for “note takers”) for a long time, rarely if ever fact-checking, and when they do, often fact-checking liberals or left-wingers who are by and large much more correct, in order to adjust for the perception of left-wing bias in the media.

    No, what shocked me is that they actually wrote such a thing down for public consumption, and that there are still editors at major newspapers who wonder if they should actually return to being journalists. It gives me a lot more hope that there might be something worth salvaging in newspapers, and that perhaps we could create a cross-ownership model, where to broadcast news on national TV you have to own a newspaper with journalistic standards, for instance.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s